Morning finally meets the President of the Kingdom of Spain in Washington with top leaders of the planet Earth. Dome with which incidentally Zapatero does not have many, either very good relations, capitalist countries whose representatives of the department of external Spanish has ignored or overlooked in the best case. In other cases, people may speak directly disregard.
File labels' cobbler '
Sarkozy love you
Sarkozy has new pet. The journey takes with him and draws a walk. It's very docile, but sometimes it proves. But Nicolas always has time to the collar of punishment.
CIS poll of May 2008
As usual, as they spoke of the CIS's surveys in the media, and what little data are analyzed. With what was like everybody appoint percentages, here I am pleased with some.
Some broad findings:
- in May, despite many subsequent events, and there was a sense of crisis generalized
- the voters themselves socialists do not believe the premises for optimistic Zapatero regarding the crisis, and that 47% of respondents voted for it and more than 88% think the situation is fair, poor or very poor, and 45% said that will go to worse.
- hence the new forms of "tense" due to economic pessimism and attributed to the People's Party, are not such as the voters themselves socialists think alike.
- Further, only 22% of respondents believe that Spain has much weight or fairly in Europe. Which means that at least half of the respondents who voted for the PSOE think that Spain has little influence or anything in Europe.
Technorati: cis, crisis, spain, May, shoemaker, survey
In the final debate between Zapatero and Rajoy prior to election day, we have to attend a meeting rather than slow, redundant and tense.
Zapatero has been locked, motionless, without responding to the defense of a taxpayer for their right to speak or write in Castilian, and their response has not been another that the systematic disruption. If in the previous version of this debate is not thought to talk of winning the debate, this time, I can not say the same thing.
A battery-founded criticisms have been made in the white President of the Government of Spain during this legislature, which has returned to respond to last-minute promises to up timelines for 2020, which once again sounds desperate. He assumed those promises, that the economy needs to be renewed after all this time arguing that the economy is doing well, and we grow above the European average.
Booted Zapatero avoiding direct insults the San Felipe converted into Rajoy, saying that his party does not use the offense, and saying that no fray. In the first block of oxígeno.Ha had anything left naked on this occasion when you do not quit playing the shifts and he played it opened. At the opening did not know where that point in deepening and throw the anchor, and according Rajoy was in his speech, Zapatero had to redirect his own, to finally see helplessly as the leader of the Popular Party left on the table lies dormant of this legislature, the helplessness and inconsistencies of the socialist legislature.
Zapatero again refer back to the past, Iraq, 11M, even the days of Franco when he said that we are still recupenrándonos's regime. Perhaps he has failed to talk about the Prestige, but was still very recent, the New Flame and the Tireless. But Rajoy has not yielded to the temptation to talk about the dirty linen of the previous socialist legislature, and its active ex-president.
The nervousness of Zapatero, has led him to forget that even on television and in public should not touch the mouth.
Tomorrow and today all the covers all the radio stations will Cand.Tech.Sci socialist as the winner, despite them both off: good night and good luck to Zapatero, and the girl dreams of Rajoy.
Technorati: discussion, general elections, Gatillazo, Rajoy, zp, cobbler
Today, few moments ago has ended, has been held the first and long awaited debate among the leading candidates for President of the Government of Spain. Good night and good luck, were the last words of the candidate who closed the debate, Zapatero. That closure has come to me I had dismissed, almost as if to sound and we will be another time and we will be a season without seeing.
Anyway, I do not like to speak in debates of winners and losers. They are not football matches, in addition to this are the elections, which then in any case can give winners and losers are the votes, and sometimes neither the votes either. Right now blog, news, talk shows, radio and television are doing their detailed analysis of all aspects of debatientes, but I want to do an analysis broadly, because if you speak to some winning all the readers of this blog think and know that My opinion is conditional, and so is, like that of many others.
Both have tried to bring the discussion to their land, their subjects strong. Rajoy has called Zapatero to explain some questions, which of course has not answered explicitly, but Zapatero has not launched questions to Rajoy.
The debate has highlighted by the data, data were available for all sites, but have proved most basic and the nearby offered Rajoy.
One thing that deserves a deeper analysis is the price of housing. If houses go up, or before boarding according commented Zapatero, is a sign that people have purchasing power to buy and pay. If the house goes up now, is a sign of people can not buy, and there is too much supply. Therefore I do not know whether it is better to let them ascend the houses, or it may be more alarming than they fall.
Continuously made comparisons to the past. Made allusions to previous legislatures of the party's opponent, and have names sounded Aznar, Acebes, Gonzalez, War ... and repeatedly mentioned the Iraq war and ETA. They have also been used endorsements absurd, in my view, of Sabina and Serrat.
Zapatero has been slower, slower, sometimes almost murmured, appeared to try to sleep Rajoy, appeasement. But Rajoy has been decided, I knew what to say and how to speak, did not hesitate and was quiet on the floor of Zapatero, watching him and addressed.
Zapatero was the first to interrupt Rajoy in a speech several times consecutively, as a pink press, and then you both have been interrupted.
On the mouth of the President of the Government of Spain have rarely heard the name of the Kingdom. Only in the last few blocks, and when referring to foreign policy, Zapatero mentioned the word Spain.
Rajoy has repeatedly accused of lying to his opponent.
Zapatero is the one who has responded or more times has appeared on screen with denying the head, who also has also been more times has exceeded his time.
In general, Zapatero has been able to close the turns of speech, but his appearance has been contained, seemed to need the size of a lectern at a rally. By contrast Rajoy has sat and has appeared comfortable after some time, has since revealed that the graphics elaborated.
The debate has taken too narrow a format, a simple exchange of shifts with limited time to discuss issues very wide, allowing easy as it wanted to dodge.
It has been a debate that was without reproach penalties nothing to speak of election programs, but this is only the opinion of one who would win to Rajoy.
Technorati: general elections, spain, Rajoy, shoemaker, debate
Once you have established clear lines stable, political speeches and public, international approaches, the potential impact ... the debate is still open more quietly but with more intensity even if it is, although less effusiveness.
Talk shows, debates and news reports, statements and press have reflected the variety of views that has prompted the intervention of the King of Spain. In these views are mixed very big concepts such as democracy, patriotism, nationalism (the nations and not that of the regions), history and even some freedom, and more.
Listening to a debate in RNE, I was able to wield two major strands of opinion among scholars and interviewed several calls from listeners. Basically was not anything he complained to the King or the President, and the difference between those who were mostly supporters of Chavez and those who do not, and end the flow of the discussion led to talk of Spanish companies operating in Venezuela. Since then, Chavez is using this niche media to claim once again its anti-imperialism, becoming viewed as a victim of the oppressive weight of the kingdom of Spain, who leads the fight against more than 500 years.
On the other hand, Zapatero quite the contrary, tries to play down the affair, using all the uproar for a caricature Aznar. That is, obviously everything that is going to simply write it down as an anecdote that may then comment on, who knows, if the actual Chavez.
As I say, time not spent in vain for the Venezuelan president, who turns by the shoulder to the King of Spain because it has fewer votes than him. The information will not work in favor of populism and the perpetuation in power, and these days are attacking those who criticize the media Venezuelan regime. There's the blog of Martha Colmenares, whose server has been attacked and erased. (1) And they complain in this blog Megaresistencia.
Has finally result in that box that was motionless in schools and public buildings, is animated. And we have seen in action in Chile, along with Zapatero, when Chavez made his show little education. But not by their low education because insults to Aznar, but his little education for not respecting his turn to speak. Hence the intervention of King.
But not only hence the phrase of the King. Like I believe that the lack of respect for Chavez was not respecting his turn to speak (and not their tributes to Aznar), I also believe that the "intermediary" King responds more to the average ink in the speech Zapataero, which his indignation at the insults toward an ex-president. The way to talk about the populist Venezuelan asking a blunt reaction, which our president did not know or could not, or did not want to show.
And is that a president who closes television channels and perpetuated in his country, nor it is not respected in his country. And certainly not going to correct Zapatero, for many reasons that lead, and indeed the wearing. So, my impression, and reading I can do this, is that despite the unexpected spirit of patriotism Zapatero, has much work to correct its foreign policy.
In recent days there has been talk of a lot of items outside. The last of the King is nothing more than a story, which is doubtful in the balance firmness of the speech of Spanish foreign policy. <!-Adsense->
First it was Sarkozy, who was to rescue our hostesses to Chad. According to media pro, because he speaks French, as in Chad. And also due to Zapatero asked to do so, but remember that ZP supported Ségolène Royal.
Then, King Visiting Ceuta and Melilla feel bad gesture to Morocco, and representatives of our field, claiming to understand Mohamed VI. This topic is quite the tale of the problems last year at the border. Those investigations were dead and so on, which doubled surveillance and barbed wire.
After that Spain gave to Morocco about 80 cars off for "patrolling" the border. Morocco, quite the opposite of the saying (a gift horse did not look at the tooth), demanded that the delivery of the gift is not made in Ceuta, but by sea As a way to not recognize the border with Ceuta Morocco. More information.
Then, the second of Commissioners, the secretary Bernardino, when finally achieved the release of the Spanish pilots in Chad, has "trouble landing" in Chad and has to do in Niger. According to the official explanation, so as not to offend local government.
