The blind justice gives reason to those who say that the above-mentioned subject, Citizenship Education, was not only teaching about civic education. Quite the contrary, the ruling said that "violates the fundamental rights of parents." (Download comprehensive ruling TSJA). That is the intent of this training course is to go and "straightening the trees" when they are small. 
The most striking, and this is what again cast doubts on the neutrality, is that whoever is going to appeal against the verdict will be directly by the Government of Andalusia, instead of those non-public entities that are interested in developing it as such . That is, that should appeal estates or political groups, since resorting to the Board every reason to believe that this is also part.
Of course all of this falls on the side of the presumption of impartiality, which in practice we all know is not the case. That way, and for purely political reasons, it is acceptable to think that the Government of Andalusia and the Government of Spain are primarily interested in resort.
Of course it could also draw IU, after that statement could suggest that justice is sponsored by the Catholic fundamentalism.
But all this is only broadly.
