Some media provincial echo of a somewhat rocambolesco reported by the coordinator Centella, which I could not find entire Internet, but I heard Full radio.
The press release says: "Centella cree that the" Catholic fundamentalism "is behind the opposition to citizenship education." In this communiqué, Centella launches a series of Alagoas to knowledge, and launches a series of value judgements on religions, and of course, references to Franco etc etc and eventually into its release has not said anything to defend this subject, if that this was his intention.
Of course, knowledge is a good thing, and that separated the person from inconsistent assumptions accepted by ignorance. But of course I believe that knowledge is not acquired in subjects such as history, literature, language, geography, mathematics, science… and I do not think that is gained in one subject where the first blocks are: Approach respectful of diversity, interpersonal relations…
As stated in this communiqué, it seems that those who have not studied this subject, or those who do not attend will be some poor ignorant. But of course, I do not think they are ways to defend something of the twenty-first century talking about the past. We could be talking about a lifetime or Franco Santiago Carrillo. This is a subject that does not respond to any educational need or knowledge.
And since Centella, has compared this subject with the fundamentalist religious indoctrination, I permino leave some people point out that compared with Tamba but a subject of Nazi education, "classes conception of the world"



















"));